BYU Strategy - Marriott School of Business

Working as a Team

Consulting is fundamentally collaborative and you work closely in team. In class you will:

Your Pod Structure

Each pod includes:

  • 1 TA: Your primary mentor, coach, and feedback-giver
  • 7-8 Students: Your learning community for the semester

Your pod serves three purposes:

  1. Support system: People rooting for your success and checking in on your progress
  2. Practice interview partners: 5 peers to practice behavioral and case interviews with
  3. Peer feedback: Resume reviews, story refinement, and honest input
Activity Frequency
Goals Worksheet + Chat Early semester
TA Mentoring Sessions 3x per semester
Practice interviews with peers 7 sessions (ongoing)
Resume review Before and after TA feedback

Team Norms

The Consulting Standard

In consulting, teams operate with high expectations:

  1. Deliver what you promise: If you commit to something, it gets done
  2. Surface issues early: Problems get bigger when hidden
  3. Prepare before meetings: Come ready to contribute
  4. Give direct feedback: Kind but honest
  5. Assume positive intent: Teammates want to succeed

Our Class Norms

We’ll hold ourselves to the same standard:

  • Show up prepared: Complete readings, bring your work
  • Engage actively: Cold calling happens; be ready
  • Meet deadlines: Late work signals unreliability
  • Support each other: Everyone’s success is good for you

Working Styles

People work differently. Understanding your style, and your teammates’ styles, reduces friction.

Common Style Dimensions

Dimension Spectrum
Communication Direct ↔︎ Diplomatic
Decision-making Fast/intuitive ↔︎ Slow/analytical
Work preference Solo focus ↔︎ Collaborative
Feedback Blunt ↔︎ Gentle
Planning Structured ↔︎ Flexible

Roles on a Consulting Team

On an engagement, common roles include:

Role Responsibility
Engagement Manager (EM) Overall workplan, client relationship, team coordination
Associate/Consultant Own a workstream, conduct analyses, build content
Business Analyst Support analyses, research, model building

In this class:

  • Your TA is like an EM: guiding, coaching, not doing your work
  • You are like an Associate: owning your workstream end-to-end
  • On capstone teams, you’ll rotate leadership responsibilities

Giving and Receiving Feedback

Feedback is the engine of improvement. Consultants get feedback frequently. Giving and acting on it is part of the Collaboration axis of the Consultant diamond; Collaboration covers the skills in depth.

Giving Feedback

Use the SBI Model:

  • Situation: When/where did this happen?
  • Behavior: What specifically did you observe?
  • Impact: What was the effect?

Example: “In our case practice yesterday (situation), you jumped to a recommendation before structuring the problem (behavior). This made it hard to follow your logic (impact).”

Receiving Feedback

  1. Listen fully: Don’t interrupt or defend
  2. Ask clarifying questions: “Can you give me an example?”
  3. Thank them: Feedback is a gift
  4. Reflect: What will you do differently?

Feedback in This Class

Feedback Type Frequency From
Project feedback After each submission TA
Practice interview feedback After each practice interview Peers + TA
Resume feedback 2x (Weeks 5, 7) TA
TA Mentoring Sessions 3x (Weeks 5, 9-10, 14) TA
Self-reflection Mid-semester You

Managing Conflict

Teams encounter conflict. How you handle it matters. For hard messages to a client, see Navigate Difficult Conversations.

Healthy Conflict

  • Debating the best approach to a problem
  • Pushing back on weak logic
  • Disagreeing about priorities

Unhealthy Conflict

  • Personal attacks
  • Avoiding hard conversations
  • Letting resentment build

Resolution Approach

  1. Address it directly: Talk to the person, not about them
  2. Focus on behavior, not character: “You missed the deadline” not “You’re unreliable”
  3. Seek to understand: What’s their perspective?
  4. Escalate if needed: TA → Professor if unresolved

Capstone Team Formation

Later in the semester, you’ll form capstone sub-teams of 3-4. Consider:

  • Complementary skills: Mix of strengths
  • Compatible styles: Can you work together under pressure?
  • Shared commitment: Equal investment in quality

More guidance will come closer to sub-team formation.