Theoretical Foundation
Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan)
Three universal human needs that drive motivation and wellbeing:
| Autonomy |
Control over your life and choices |
Agency — moral agency, stewardship |
| Competence |
Growth, mastery, becoming more capable |
Becoming — eternal progression, growing toward divine potential |
| Relatedness |
Connection to others, belonging |
Connection — covenant relationships, community |
Core Insight
The user is always an individual. Households and organizations don’t click buttons — people do. SDT applies regardless of context (personal, household, or work).
Theory of the Firm
Organizations exist to create value and capture a portion of it (Brandenburger & Stuart 1996, Teece 2010).
The Work sub-domains map to these two goals:
| Create Value |
Discovering, Designing, Producing |
| Capture Value |
Acquiring, Delivering, Retaining |
B2B products solve friction at the intersection of an organizational activity and an employee’s unmet human need.
Opportunity Signals
Both frustration and delight are valid signals pointing to product opportunities:
| Frustration |
Pain Reliever |
Reduce friction; remove obstacles; solve problems |
| Delight |
Gain Creator |
Amplify joy; create more of what works; enhance experiences |
Problems aren’t only about pain. A frustration points to a pain reliever product. A delight points to a gain creator product. Both are valid starting points.
Scoring
Opportunity Score (1–5 scales)
| 1 |
Rarely |
Shrug |
Meh |
Wouldn’t pay |
Just me |
| 2 |
Yearly |
Minor annoyance |
Mildly pleasant |
Unlikely to pay |
Small niche |
| 3 |
Monthly |
Annoying |
Enjoyable |
Might pay |
Moderate group |
| 4 |
Weekly |
Frustrating |
Love it |
Probably would pay |
Large segment |
| 5 |
Daily |
I hate this |
Can’t live without |
Already paying for solutions |
Widespread |
Conviction Score (0/1 checkboxes, sum of 4)
| Personal Pain |
You live this problem yourself |
| Close Relationship |
Someone you love experiences this |
| Moral Calling |
You believe it’s wrong that this problem exists |
| Unique Insight or Skills |
You see something others don’t, or your skills position you to solve this |
| 0–1 |
Low |
Weak foundation — reconsider |
| 2 |
Moderate |
Worth exploring further |
| 3–4 |
High |
Strong conviction to pursue |
Technical Feasibility (0/1 checkboxes, sum of 3)
| Data/API Access |
I can get the data or API access I need |
| Technology Readiness |
Tech is good enough to deliver a great experience |
| No Hardware or Regulatory Blockers |
Does not require unavailable hardware or regulatory approval |
| 3 |
Clear |
Clear path to build |
| 1–2 |
Caution |
Some challenges — have a plan |
| 0 |
Blocked |
Major concerns — reconsider or simplify |
Gospel Framework
Three directional checks rooted in Self-Determination Theory and alignment with gospel principles:
| Expands Agency |
Agency |
Does my value proposition expand what users can do and choose? |
| Supports Becoming |
Becoming |
Does my value proposition help users genuinely grow? |
| Deepens Connection |
Connection |
Does my value proposition strengthen real relationships? |
Key Principles
- Not every product needs all three. Pure tools (Uber, Amazon) may only expand agency — that’s fine.
- The question is directional. For the needs you DO touch, are you on the right side?
- Design details matter. The same product type can be either beneficial or harmful.
- Dependency is not inherently bad. Electricity creates dependency AND expands agency. The test is whether the dependency empowers or exploits.
- Principles from D&C 121: Persuasion, long-suffering, love unfeigned — the relationship between product and user should be one of genuine service, not extraction.